# Benchmark 3 v1: Quast results analysis

## Agathis_dammara

* bad result due to wrong oriented contig order


## Begonia_pulchrifolia

* Unfeasible


## Carpodetus_serratus

* Two misassemblies because of local inversion in the single-copy


## Commiphora_foliacea

**Unexpected**

* 5 local misassemblies and 0 global misassembly due to links sequences (c.f. contig Quast evaluation)
* 98% coverage


## Cucumis_hystrix

**Unexpected**

* While the order is not retrieved, near-perfect Quast alignment (miss 148bp, 100 % cover).
    * Note that the missing contig ($7$) is 303bp length.

## Eucommia_ulmoides

**Unexpected**

* 5 local misassemblies due to the sequences of the links (c.f. contig Quast evaluation)


## Jasminum_tortuosum

* Inversion of contig $4$ (2 misassemblies)


## Juniperus_scopulorum

**Unexpected**

* 1 local misassembly due to the sequences of the links (c.f. contig Quast evaluation)


## Lamprocapnos_spectabilis

* Wrong oriented contig order


## Lathyrus_pubescens

**Unexpected**

* 98.50% coverage with 0 misassembly and 2 local misassemblies as contig $12$ is tiny


## Lophocereus_schottii

* 1 misassembly because of the inversion


## Musa_ornata

**Unexpected**

* 2 local misassemblies due to the sequences of the link (c.f. contig Quast evaluation)


## Pelargonium_nanum

* 4 misassemblies because of missing contigs


## Podocarpus_totara

* 4 misassemblies because of wrong oriented contig order


## Sciadopitys_verticillata

**Unexpected**

* 1 misassembly particularly because of wrong sequence of link $(22_f, 3_f)$


## Taxus_baccata

**Unexpected**

* 2 local misassemblies due to the sequences of the link (c.f. contig Quast evaluation)


## Triosteum_pinnatifidum

**Unexpected**

* 99.28% coverage and 0 misassembly, 2 local misassemblies


## Welwitschia_mirabilis

**Unexpected**

* 1 local misassembly due to the sequences of the link (c.f. contig Quast evaluation)